Electronic
Real Estate Recording Task Force
Recording
Content and Workflow Subcommittee
Minutes: 10
January 2002
In
Attendance: Angela Burrs-
Fillmore County Auditor, Denny Kron, Deputy Auditor Stearns, Don Goedken
DOT, Gail Miller Recorder Renville, Jeff Carlson CI Title, Larry Dalien
Anoka County Recorder, Paul McGinley Surveyor Loucks & McIagan,
Jeanine Barker, Lyon County Recorder
This
subcommittee walked through their particular workflow needs and identified
areas for consideration by the consultants. Considerations that were
specifically identified are listed at the end of this document.
Don
Goedken - DOT
Data
Content areas for concentrated analysis:
-
Tract
Index – we need this to research how title is held (who owns
property)
-
PIN
– this needs to be tied into the record and needs to be unique,
there are too many issues around its unique value
-
Multiple
Grantors – we would like to continue to see all grantors listed.
Workflow
-
We
walk documents through to the Recorder’s office: Deeds, Right of
Way Plat (statute 160.05) Lis Pendens, Mortgage Releases
-
Final
Certificates need a wet signature,
-
Any
Certified copy of orders has DOT stamp on them and then they are
filed at the Recorder’s office. We receive document numbers while
we wait – the DOT Stamp could be an issue.
Denny
Kron – Deputy Auditor Stearns
-
The
Parcel ID Number (PIN#) should be standard. For GIS, the County
prefix number given to the county by the state (Stearns is #73)
would be useful for this issue. Also many counties reuse the PIN#.
This is somewhat of a problem but a PIN# is only a tool to get
information and not the recording number, such as a document number.
This should be one of the questions asked at counties. Do you use
PIN#s and what information do you use for the PIN# and do you reuse
them?
Land
Surveyors Concerns: Paul McGinley, L.S.
-
One
primary activity currently is for research at the County Recorders
office, although numerous documents created by Land Surveyors (LS)
are recorded and would need to be accommodated in the electronic
recording process.
-
Filing
of subdivision plats (Chapter 505 of Minnesota statutes). Files can
be large, graphic files with numerous landowners and government
agencies signing, often not at the same time or same location. (Many
other legal real estate documents will have the same multiple
signature status that will have to be accommodated). Having
subdivision plats on-line should be included in the pilots since
they are significant real estate documents and will need to be
merged into county GIS systems in the future, if they already aren’t
in a particular county.
-
CIC
(common interest community) plats = cooperatives, condos and
townhouses. Similarly complex with multiple signatures.
-
RLS
(registered land survey) – goes to Registrar of Titles office.
Also a graphic file in the form of a legal document that would have
to be recorded in real estate records.
-
Certain
Survey maps get filed with both the Registrar of Titles office and
the District Court as well as the Recorder’s office.
-
Street
and Road Vacation Resolutions – may originate at a City or via the
district court (also would include street and road opening
documents)
-
Surveyors
will sometimes have to file a Certificate of Correction for land
subdivision plats – these get filed in county recorders office or
registrar of titles office.
-
Property
Registration Statutes need the legal subcommittee to look at them.
There are provisions in them requiring that recorded documents (such
as the RLS above) be of a particular size sheet made of a certain
mylar material, etc. Some of these requirements, and possibly
others, would have to be statutorily revised to allow electronic
recording.
-
Certain
filings are done by the title company usually, but the nature of the
document being recorded, such as the subdivision plat or RLS or
condo floor plan, would have to be created by the surveyor in a
format compatible with electronic filing.
-
When
recording any land split (RLS, plat or CIC such as a condo) the
Torrens examiner of titles may need to be involved if the property
is torrens (registered land). Also, any filing of a land split such
as these alerts the treasurer’s office that real estate taxes must
be paid; and auditor’s office checks for delinquent taxes.
Sometimes this starts with Treasurers office before the Recorder
sees it (Filmore County for example)
Larry
Dalien – Anoka County Recorder
Angela
Burrs – Fillmore County Auditor
-
Taxes
are collected before recorders file a deed.
-
CRV:
documents are multipart paper. The auditor numbers it and stamps it
and sends it to the Dept of Revenue. SS# is on the document and there
are privacy issues. Someone should look into this area.
-
Collection
of delinquent taxes is done prior to recording of deed. Deeds need to
start in the Auditor – Treasurer’s office.
-
Auditor
and Treasurer need to be able to collect taxes owed. How this will be
accomplished, either by using one collection point or several, needs
to be determined.
-
If
they emboss a deed or mortgage – how will this be handled in
e-recording world?
-
Green
Acres tax: you need to be able to search out taxes prior to granting
Green Acres rights to a property. When it gets sold you need to be
able to remove tax shields and recalculate tax fees.
-
You
need the ability to reject or return documents sent in as "not
recorded". If documents are not compliant with standards you must
be able to reject what is not right.
-
You
must be able to accept but still hold onto documents until funds are
in an account. Documents should not be recorded until funds clear the
account. How can this be handled in e-recording world?
-
Auditors
have to maintain real estate tax systems and part of this is managing
an accurate parcel database. Parcel numbers are important here. They
check to ensure that taxpayer has the correct size, shape and parcel
of record. This would be covered under Statue # 272-01, 272-115,
272-121, 272-19, 272-119, these are some of the areas that explain the
Auditor’s Review.
Jeff
Carlson – CI Title
Gail
Miller – Recorder Renville
Consideration
#22: Courts have documents that are certified copies that must be
recorded. How will this be handled in e-recording?
Consideration
#23: We need to see where everyone is at with a GIS system at their
office. This will help define where people need to go. Doing C/B may be
out of scope.
What
benefit would a Recorder’s office get out of layering these documents
with GIS information? This should be detailed out by the consultants.
Does
everyone have ˝ section maps? Pictorial of division within a plot. Parcel
ID# needs to relate to GIS map. Does everyone have Parcel ID? Is it a
unique number in a county or are they reusing them? If they reuse it this
could make historical searches inaccurate. An ID may pull up information
it was related to previously and not to the parcel it is associated with
now.
Consideration
#24: We need to get to a point where you can code a parcel to make it
easier to locate. A code is needed to locate a piece and verify legal
description. This is like a parent / child relationship. This would be a
description of that parcel (CSM). That code would then live with that
parcel. It is cheaper to do it this way. But is this truly in scope?
Consideration
#25: Should the PIN number be standard?
Consideration
#26: A Public / Private collaboration would work best here. There should
be a stake holder’s committee. ERER will continue after this initiative
is complete, or some such group. Something like the legislature creation
of LRM group.
|