|   Electronic
      Real Estate Recording Task ForceRecording
      Content and Workflow Subcommittee Minutes: 10
      January 2002 In
      Attendance: Angela Burrs-
      Fillmore County Auditor, Denny Kron, Deputy Auditor Stearns, Don Goedken
      DOT, Gail Miller Recorder Renville, Jeff Carlson CI Title, Larry Dalien
      Anoka County Recorder, Paul McGinley Surveyor Loucks & McIagan,
      Jeanine Barker, Lyon County Recorder This
      subcommittee walked through their particular workflow needs and identified
      areas for consideration by the consultants. Considerations that were
      specifically identified are listed at the end of this document. Don
      Goedken - DOT 
        
        Data
        Content areas for concentrated analysis: 
        
          
            Tract
            Index – we need this to research how title is held (who owns
            property)
            PIN
            – this needs to be tied into the record and needs to be unique,
            there are too many issues around its unique value
            Multiple
            Grantors – we would like to continue to see all grantors listed. 
        
        Workflow 
        
          
            We
            walk documents through to the Recorder’s office: Deeds, Right of
            Way Plat (statute 160.05) Lis Pendens, Mortgage Releases
            Final
            Certificates need a wet signature,
            Any
            Certified copy of orders has DOT stamp on them and then they are
            filed at the Recorder’s office. We receive document numbers while
            we wait – the DOT Stamp could be an issue. Denny
      Kron – Deputy Auditor Stearns 
        
          
            The
            Parcel ID Number (PIN#) should be standard. For GIS, the County
            prefix number given to the county by the state (Stearns is #73)
            would be useful for this issue. Also many counties reuse the PIN#.
            This is somewhat of a problem but a PIN# is only a tool to get
            information and not the recording number, such as a document number.
            This should be one of the questions asked at counties. Do you use
            PIN#s and what information do you use for the PIN# and do you reuse
            them? Land
      Surveyors Concerns: Paul McGinley, L.S. 
        
          
            One
            primary activity currently is for research at the County Recorders
            office, although numerous documents created by Land Surveyors (LS)
            are recorded and would need to be accommodated in the electronic
            recording process.
            Filing
            of subdivision plats (Chapter 505 of Minnesota statutes). Files can
            be large, graphic files with numerous landowners and government
            agencies signing, often not at the same time or same location. (Many
            other legal real estate documents will have the same multiple
            signature status that will have to be accommodated). Having
            subdivision plats on-line should be included in the pilots since
            they are significant real estate documents and will need to be
            merged into county GIS systems in the future, if they already aren’t
            in a particular county.
            CIC
            (common interest community) plats = cooperatives, condos and
            townhouses. Similarly complex with multiple signatures.
            RLS
            (registered land survey) – goes to Registrar of Titles office.
            Also a graphic file in the form of a legal document that would have
            to be recorded in real estate records.
            Certain
            Survey maps get filed with both the Registrar of Titles office and
            the District Court as well as the Recorder’s office.
            Street
            and Road Vacation Resolutions – may originate at a City or via the
            district court (also would include street and road opening
            documents)
            Surveyors
            will sometimes have to file a Certificate of Correction for land
            subdivision plats – these get filed in county recorders office or
            registrar of titles office.
            Property
            Registration Statutes need the legal subcommittee to look at them.
            There are provisions in them requiring that recorded documents (such
            as the RLS above) be of a particular size sheet made of a certain
            mylar material, etc. Some of these requirements, and possibly
            others, would have to be statutorily revised to allow electronic
            recording.
            Certain
            filings are done by the title company usually, but the nature of the
            document being recorded, such as the subdivision plat or RLS or
            condo floor plan, would have to be created by the surveyor in a
            format compatible with electronic filing.
            When
            recording any land split (RLS, plat or CIC such as a condo) the
            Torrens examiner of titles may need to be involved if the property
            is torrens (registered land). Also, any filing of a land split such
            as these alerts the treasurer’s office that real estate taxes must
            be paid; and auditor’s office checks for delinquent taxes.
            Sometimes this starts with Treasurers office before the Recorder
            sees it (Filmore County for example) Larry
      Dalien – Anoka County Recorder Angela
      Burrs – Fillmore County Auditor 
        
        
        
          Taxes
          are collected before recorders file a deed.
          CRV:
          documents are multipart paper. The auditor numbers it and stamps it
          and sends it to the Dept of Revenue. SS# is on the document and there
          are privacy issues. Someone should look into this area.
          Collection
          of delinquent taxes is done prior to recording of deed. Deeds need to
          start in the Auditor – Treasurer’s office.
          Auditor
          and Treasurer need to be able to collect taxes owed. How this will be
          accomplished, either by using one collection point or several, needs
          to be determined.
          If
          they emboss a deed or mortgage – how will this be handled in
          e-recording world?
          Green
          Acres tax: you need to be able to search out taxes prior to granting
          Green Acres rights to a property. When it gets sold you need to be
          able to remove tax shields and recalculate tax fees.
          You
          need the ability to reject or return documents sent in as "not
          recorded". If documents are not compliant with standards you must
          be able to reject what is not right.
          You
          must be able to accept but still hold onto documents until funds are
          in an account. Documents should not be recorded until funds clear the
          account. How can this be handled in e-recording world?
          Auditors
          have to maintain real estate tax systems and part of this is managing
          an accurate parcel database. Parcel numbers are important here. They
          check to ensure that taxpayer has the correct size, shape and parcel
          of record. This would be covered under Statue # 272-01, 272-115,
          272-121, 272-19, 272-119, these are some of the areas that explain the
          Auditor’s Review. Jeff
      Carlson – CI Title Gail
      Miller – Recorder Renville Consideration
      #22: Courts have documents that are certified copies that must be
      recorded. How will this be handled in e-recording? Consideration
      #23: We need to see where everyone is at with a GIS system at their
      office. This will help define where people need to go. Doing C/B may be
      out of scope. What
      benefit would a Recorder’s office get out of layering these documents
      with GIS information? This should be detailed out by the consultants. Does
      everyone have ˝ section maps? Pictorial of division within a plot. Parcel
      ID# needs to relate to GIS map. Does everyone have Parcel ID? Is it a
      unique number in a county or are they reusing them? If they reuse it this
      could make historical searches inaccurate. An ID may pull up information
      it was related to previously and not to the parcel it is associated with
      now. Consideration
      #24: We need to get to a point where you can code a parcel to make it
      easier to locate. A code is needed to locate a piece and verify legal
      description. This is like a parent / child relationship. This would be a
      description of that parcel (CSM). That code would then live with that
      parcel. It is cheaper to do it this way. But is this truly in scope? Consideration
      #25: Should the PIN number be standard? Consideration
      #26: A Public / Private collaboration would work best here. There should
      be a stake holder’s committee. ERER will continue after this initiative
      is complete, or some such group. Something like the legislature creation
      of LRM group.
     |