TO: |
Members of the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement |
FROM: |
Lawrence A. Martin, Executive Director |
|
|
DATE: |
August 16, 2001 |
Introduction
In 1984, when the manner in which actuarial valuations and related actuarial reports for the various statewide and major local retirement plans was significantly revised, the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement was charged with selecting and contracting with the consulting actuarial firm to prepare the actuarial valuations and reports and was required to promulgate the standards for pension valuations and proposed benefit increase cost estimates.
Minnesota Statutes, Section 3.85, Subdivision 10, requires the Commission to adopt the standards and to update them annually. The Commission adopted the initial set of standards as of June 30, 1985. After adopting additional amendments in 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1992, the Commission last amended the standards for actuarial work on June 13, 1996.
Proposed Amendments to the Standards
The principal consultant with the actuarial firm of Milliman USA with respect to the Commission’s account, Thomas K. Custis, F.S.A., reviewed the standards in 2000 and suggested a number of revisions. Following Mr. Custis’ review in 2000, the Commission staff also identified a number of additional revisions in the standards, which are largely stylistic and cross-reference corrections.
The various amendments to the standards, grouped topically, are as follows:
Previous Document Circulation and Review
The attached document includes both the revisions proposed by Mr. Custis and the revisions suggested by the Commission staff. The revisions suggested by Mr. Custis are indicated by strikeout for suggested deletions and underscoring for suggested additions. The revisions suggested by the Commission staff are indicated by italicized strikeout for suggested deletions and italicized underscoring for suggested additions.
The attached document was circulated to all of the statewide and major local pension plan administrators during June-July 2000, with a request that each of those plan administrators forward a copy to their actuarial advisor, if any.
No favorable or unfavorable comments on the attached document have been received by the Commission staff since the document was circulated in June-July 2000.
Recommendations and Conclusion
The revisions in the standards for actuarial work require Commission approval before they take effect. Because the action does not involve a recommendation on proposed legislation, under Commission Rule 5.0, only a simple majority of the Commission members constituting a quorum is necessary for the Commission to approve the changes.
The Commission staff recommends Commission approval of the amendments to the standards for actuarial work following the taking of testimony or comments from interested parties at the August 23, 2001, meeting. The Commission staff and the consulting actuary retained by the Commission, Thomas K. Custis of Milliman USA, are prepared to review the proposed revisions in detail during the course of the August 23, 2001, meeting and to answer Commission member questions.